Leadership Lessons: Struggling to Develop a Team Mentality 4

A final list of reasons a church may struggle to develop a team mentality:

 

4. Leader's Reasons

Leader wishes to retain strong control over all aspects of church life

Developing a team means the leader sacrificing doing some of the stuff they personally enjoy most

Wrong theology held by the leader. eg "growth happens  through  teaching, I am the teacher, so I do everything"

Feeling disenfranchised and threatened by others who don’t have the benefit of my professional training taking a leading role

Leaders who don’t have time or perceived ability to develop team

Leaders being unable or unwilling to cope with negative consequences of things being done less well or of trying to change long-standing traditions

 

We might summarise the four lists as follows. Churches struggle to develop a team mentality when:

 

  • structures don’t encourage it
  • leaders don’t want it
  • congregational institutional assumptions don’t want to
  • historical assumptions don’t’ allow
  • personalities are not temperamentally amenable 

 

All of which are likely to cause leaders to dismiss developing teamwork as an unwelcome extra burden

Leadership Lessons: Struggling to Develop a Team Mentality 3

A third list of reasons why a church may struggle to develop a team mentality:

 

3. Individual's Reasons

Not realising they have spiritual gifts

Not realising they are meant to actively contribute

Thinking that only extreme talent is welcome – like in a sports team

Not motivated, not thrilled with God or church

"I go for what I get out of it" mentality

Spiritual immaturity and selfishness

Want things to happen, but want someone else to take responsibility: “you should do this”. (I think of a church that was exploring the possibility of church planting. It surveryed the congregation and discovered one portion of its demographic saying "do whatever you like as long as it doesn't disrupt my Sunday worship experience and I don't personally have to be involved.")

Leadership Lessons: Struggling to Develop a Team Mentality 2

The second in a series of four short lists on why a church may struggle to develop a team mentality.

 

2. Organisational Reasons

Relational poverty – no sense of fellowship or really knowing each other

All effort put into running high quality main meetings rather than into discipleship or team building 

Structures (or theology) are set up to give most responsibility to few people, encouraging passive receivers

Leaders or congregation not able to cope with participative or consultative leadership, hence no invitation to others to take initiative

Lack of capitalisation of team. Unwillingness to take resources from other places to make team work

Organisational structure set up to disenfranchise the majority

View that the leader retains a degree of detachment from the community as the elite, trained professional 

Leadership Lessons: The Leader as Change Agent 1

Kingdom growth involves constant change by definition. A church that wants to be in exactly the same place in 10 years time is extremely complacent and will atrophy. Leaders are the people who mainly expect to receive and shape God-given vision and direction for where the church and its mission can and should be in the future. Change, however, is the biggest threat to stable organisational life so being able to lead through change is critical to church and kingdom growth. Whether leaders are allowed to lead for change, and how they do so, will determine whether a church develops for future gospel extension or concretises itself in a past reality.
Read more

Leadership Lessons: More on Leaders and Character

The myth that there is no connection is dangerous because it divorces leadership from character. It turns it into merely a combination of skills to be exercised, opportunities to be pursued and networks to be leveraged. Of course, with that combination it is possible to create, for example, a very profitable business. But what it is not possible to do is help people be the kinds of people they should be and do the kinds of things they should do. Because that kind of leadership isn’t driven by values, only by end results, with leadership ‘success’ being defined by a very narrow and inadequate set of criteria. It doesn’t have to be honourable, compassionate, moral or even honest in order to seem to work.
Read more